Diagnostic Approach of Angelman Syndrome (2024)

  • Journal List
  • Maedica (Bucur)
  • v.8(4); 2013 Sep
  • PMC3968465

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

Diagnostic Approach of Angelman Syndrome (1)

Link to Publisher's site

Maedica (Bucur). 2013 Sep; 8(4): 321–327.

PMCID: PMC3968465

PMID: 24790661

Denis George DUCA,c Dana CRAIU,a Monica BOER,a Sorina Mihaela CHIRIEAC,b Aurora ARGHIR,b Andreea TUTULAN-CUNITA,b Diana BARCA,a Catrinel ILIESCU,a Agripina LUNGEANU,b Sanda MAGUREANU,a and Magdalena BUDISTEANUa,b

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

ABSTRACT

Background: Angelman syndrome (AS) is a genetic condition, characterized by severe mental retardation, ataxic gait, severe speech delay, dysmorphic features, abnormal behaviour, movement disorder. It is caused by a variety of genetic mechanisms which all interfere with expression of the UBE3A gene on chromosome 15q11-13.

Objectives: To present our experience regarding diagnosis of children with Angelman syndrome.

Material and methods: 15 children were clinically and genetically diagnosed with AS in the Department of Pediatric Neurology of the "Prof. Dr. Alex. Obregia" Clinical Hospital. In all cases, diagnosis of AS was made by the clinical criteria. The clinical evaluation focused on the patient history, a general examination, dysmorphological evaluation, a neurological examination, psychological evaluation, and paraclinical tests.

Results: All patients from this study presented the characteristic facial features and the characteristic behavior phenotype. Psychom*otor development was delayed in all children, most of cases (73%) presenting with sever mental retardation. Epileptic seizures were observed in all patients with microdeletion, the partial seizures being the most frequent type. EEG in all children showed the characteristic pattern for AS.

Conclusions: Angelman syndrome is a rare and severe neurodevelopmental disorder, with a complex clinical picture. There are some characteristic facial features, which, in association with hypopigmentation, happy disposition, jerky movements, and ataxia in a child with psychom*otor delay should raise the strong suspicion of AS.

INTRODUCTION

Angelman syndrome (AS) is a severe neurodevelopmental condition. Developmental deficits, mental retardation, epilepsy, severe speech impairment with small or without the use of words, hyperactivity and microcephaly are distinctive for the syndrome. Coordination disturbance and movement disorders (ataxia) are a reason for main functional deficits. Babies with the disease have a regular appearance at birth, but at one to two months, feeding problems can be noticed and developmental delay becomes apparent between six and twelve months of life, whereas seizures typically start before three years of age. Patients with AS are recognizable by their content attitude with frequent smiling and laughter and hand- flapping movements (1,2). Different studies estimate the prevalence between 1/10.000 – in Denmark – and as rare as 1/40.000 – in Australia (3,4). 60-80% of persons with AS etiologically have a deletion in the proximal part of the long arm of the maternal chromosome 15 in the gene locus 15q11.2- 15q13. Six per cent have imprinting mutations, five per cent show a mutation in the ubiquitin- protein ligase E3A (UBE3A) gene and one per cent of patients either have unipaternal disomies (UPD) or chromosomal structural anomalies (translocations) (5). Deletions or UPDs show a low reoccurrence risk whereas imprinting defects and translocations have an increased incidence of reoccurrence (6). In the other 20 per cent of patients, no abnormal genetic patterns can be found (5). In these cases the clinical criterions diagnose the syndrome but the molecular genetic studies do not show abnormalities (7).

The consensus criteria for the diagnosis of AS are a summary of the developmental and physical findings according to their frequencies in the syndrome. Not all of the characteristics have to be present for the diagnosis (8). The most consistent clinical feature is the behavioral one and a wide index of clinical suspicion for the behavioral phenotype should be made (9). The three categories of the consensus criteria comprise consistent features in 100 per cent of patients, frequent features in over 80 per cent of patients and associated features in 20 to 80 per cent of patients (9).

Consistent (100%) features are: 1.) Developmental delay, functionally severe; 2.) Movement or balance disorder, usually ataxia of gait and/ or tremulous movement of limbs. Movement disorder can be mild. May not appear as frank ataxia but can be forward lurching, unsteadiness, clumsiness, or quick, jerky movements; 3.) Behavioral uniqueness: any combination of frequent laughter/ smiling. Apparent happy demeanor; easily excitable personality, often with uplifted hand-flapping or waving movements; hypermotoric behavior; 4.) Speech impairment, none or minimal use of words; receptive and non-verbal communication skills higher than verbal ones.

Frequent features (>80%) are: 1.) Delayed, disproportionate growth in head circumference, usually resulting in microcephaly (≤2 standard deviations (SD) of normal occipito- frontal circumference (OFC)) by age of 2 years. Microcephaly is more pronounced in those with 15q11.2-q13 deletions; 2.) Seizures, onset usually <3 yrs. of age. Seizure severity usually decreases with age but the seizure disorder lasts throughout adulthood; 3.) Abnormal EEG, with a characteristic pattern. The EEG abnormalities can occur in the first 2 years of life and can precede clinical features, and are often not correlated to clinical seizure events.

Associated features (20-80%) are: flat occiput, occipital groove, protruding tongue, tongue thrusting, suck/swallowing disorders, feeding problems and/or truncal hypotonia during infancy, prognathia, wide mouth, wide-spaced teeth, frequent drooling, excessive chewing/mouthing behaviors, strabismus, hypopigmented skin, light hair and eye color (compared to family), seen only in deletion cases, hyperactive lower extremity deep tendon reflexes, uplifted, flexed arm position especially during ambulation, wide-based gait with pronated or valgus-positioned ankles, increased sensitivity to heat, abnormal sleep wake cycles and diminished need for sleep, attraction to/fascination with water, fascination with crinkly items such as certain papers and plastics, abnormal food related behaviors, obesity (in the older child), scoliosis, constipation (10). ❑

AIM

To present our experience regarding the clinical diagnosis of children with AS, in the Department of Pediatric Neurology of "Prof. Dr. Alexandru Obregia" Clinical Hospital.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 2008 and 2013, 15 children (5 male and 10 female) were clinically and genetically diagnosed with AS in the Department of Pediatric Neurology of the "Prof. Dr. Alex. Obregia" Clinical Hospital. In all cases, diagnosis of AS was made by the clinical criteria for AS established by Williams and colleagues (10). The clinical evaluation of the children included: patient history, general, dysmorphological and neurological examination, and psychological evaluation (developmental quotient score, DQ, and behavioral phenotype). This evaluation was completed with paraclinical investigations: biological test, EEG and neuroimagistic studies (computed tomography, CT; Magnetic resonance imaging, MRI). The anamnesis included family history, personal history, with a special attention to pregnancy and birth aspects, psychom*otor development, as well as disease and seizure history. Seizure history focused on seizure onset, type and treatment. Genetic tests, including FISH with specific probes for AS region and methylation PCR, were performed by the Medical Genetic Laboratory of 'Victor Babes" National Institute of Pathology. ❑

RESULTS

Pre- and perinatal risk factors of the patients with AS

No particular risk factors were noted in our cases, except for an increased maternal age (1 case), and hormonal therapy for abortion risk (1 case). Regarding the time of birth, 14 patients were born on term and 1 patient was born on early term.

14 patients had a normal Apgar score and only 1 patient had a low Apgar score.

Clinical characteristics

The clinical characteristics of the 15 patients with AS are presented in Table ​Table11 and Table ​Table2.2. All children presented normal height and growth. In that regard the head circumference, 80% of the cases with AS had microcephaly, and only 20% of the patients had a normal head circumference. This finding is consistent with the current "Consensus criteria for the diagnosis of AS" that counts microcephaly to the frequent features that are present in over 80% of cases. The clasical facial phenotype of AS and skin and hair hypopigmentation were observed in all children (Figure ​(Figure11).

Table 1

General patient data.

Patient Nr.SexAgeGeneral anatomical parameters
Height (cm)Weight (kg)Head circumference (cm)
1.Female11y 9m150 (50%)30(>10%)50,5 (25-50%)
2.Male3y 3m93(50-75%)14 (50%)47 (<3%)
3.Female2y 8m85(50%)17 (<95%)49 (25-50%)
4.Male2y 3m87(25-50%)15 (50%)46 (<3%)
5.Male2y86(25-50%)11 (10%)45,5 (<3%)
6.Female1y 5m79 (50-75%)11 (<25%)44 (<3%)
7.Male8y120(>10%)21 (>10%)48 (<3%)
8.Female1y 7m76 (25-50%)11 (>10%)44 (<3%)
9.Female10m75,5 (75%)10,3 (90%)42 (<3%)
10.Female7y 8m120 (50%)25 (50%)50 (10%)
11.Female1y 4m77(50-75%)9(<50%)44 (5%)
12.Female3y 1m96 (50-75%)13, 5 (25%)46 (<3%)
13.Male2y 10m100 (50%)13 (25-50%)50 (25-50%)
14.Female1y 1m81 (50%)10,5 (50%)46 (<3%)
15.Female3y 2m97 (75%)15 (75%)47 (<3%)

Open in a separate window

Table 2

General patient data.

Patient Nr.Patient Nr.Percentage
123456789101112131415%
Consistent Features
DD+++++++++++++++(15/15) 100%
Speech impairment+++++++++++++++(15/15) 100%
Movement /balance disorder+++++++++++++++(15/15) 100%
Behavioral abnormalities+++++++++++++++(15/15) 100%
Frequent Features
AM-+-++++++--+-++(10/15) 67%
RM---------++----(2/15) 13%
Seizures++++++++++----+(11/15) 73%
Abnormal EEG+++++++++++++++(15/15) 100%
Associated Features
Sleep disturbance+-+-++---+--++-(7/15) 47%
Fascination water+------+-+-++++(7/15) 47%
Wide mouth, wide spaced teeth+++++++++++++++-(14/15) 93%
Hypopigmented skin, light hair and eye color+++++++++-+++-+(13/15) 87%
Frequent drooling--+---------+---(2/15) 13%
Hyperactive extremity deep tendon reflexes-+++--+---+-+--(6/15) 40%
Strabismus-------+--+----(2/15) 13%
Flexed arm position during ambulation+-++-+-+-+-----(6/15) 40%
Feeding problems during infancy------------+--(1/15) 7%
Protruding tongue-++--+---++----(5/15) 33%
Flat occiput-+--+++-++++-+-(9/15) 60%
Prognathia+++--------+++-(6/15) 40%
Trunkal hypotonia during infancy+-+-+++++--+-+-(9/15) 60%
Wide- based gait+++-+-++-+-+++-(10/15) 67%
Scoliosis+--------------(1/15) 7%
EMB---+----+++----(5/15) 33%

Open in a separate window

DD = Developmental Delay; AM = Absolute Microcephaly; RM = Relative Microcephaly; EMB = Excessive mouthing behavior

Open in a separate window

Figure 1

Facial phenotype of a child with AS, showing deep set eyes; pointed chin; wide, smiling mouth, blond hair, blue eyes.

Regarding motor development, 6 of the patients had a delayed head control. The milestone of sitting was delayed in 12 patients and none of the cases was able to walk within normal time limits (Table ​(Table3).3). Ataxia and movement disorders were noted in all patients (Table ​(Table22).

Table 3

Psychom*otor development.

Patient Nr.
Psychom*otor parameter123456789101112131415
Motor developmentHead control1y 2m3m7m2y 3m4m>1y 5m4 m8m4m3m3m3m4 m7m3m
Un- supported sitting4y6m10m2y 3m1y>1y 5m1y1y 1m7.5m1y 8m1y1 y 2m9.5m7m6m
Walking6y1y 2m2y 10m-2y-2y 1m1y 7m>1y 5m3y 7m-3y 1m3y 3m1y 10m1y 7m
Speech developmentBabbling++++++++-++++++
Speech (single words)++-+--+--+---+-
Executing commands--+/----+--+--++-
DQ3434252036<20343334253425455431
Mental developmentMild delay-------------+-
Moderate delay----+-------+--
Severe delay++++--++++++--+
Profound delay-----+---------

Open in a separate window

Concerning the mental development, 7% of the patients had mild developmental delay, moderate delay was found in 13%, the majority (73%) had severe developmental delay, profound delay was found in another 7% of patients (Table ​(Table33).

All children presented the characteristic behavioral phenotype of AS, namely frequent laughter and a happy demeanor, autistic traits could be observed in 9 cases and hand flapping as well as hypermotoric behavior were each found in 7 patients (Table ​(Table44).

Table 4

Behavioral traits.

Patient Nr.
123456789101112131415
Behavioral uniqueness
Frequent laughter/ smiling+++++++++++++++
Happy demeanor+++++++++++++++
Excitability/ hand flapping+-+++-----+++--
Hypermotoric+++++------++--
Other
Autistic traits++-++-+--+-++-+

Open in a separate window

11 patients with AS presented epilepsy, the onset of epileptic seizures was between 0-4 months in 1 patient, between 5-8 months in 2 cases, 3 patients had the onset between 9-12 months and another 3 cases between 13-16 months, an seizure onset over 16 months was found in 2 patients.

Out of the 11 patients with AS that had epilepsy, 55% had more than one ype of seizures including generalized, partial seizures, atonic and atypical absence seizures, the other cases had single type seizures: 36% had partial seizures and 9% had generalized seizures, no patient had convulsive status epilepticus. One child presented infantile spasms (case 9).

In that concern the EEG characteristics of our AS patients, all the cases had diffuse high amplitude slow wave discharges and spikes (Figure ​(Figure22).

Open in a separate window

Figure 2

EEG pattern in AS showing slow background activity, mixed with spikes.

CT/ MRI aspects in the patients with AS

12 of our AS patients were investigated by CT/MRI. A normal aspect was noted in 4 children, and in 8 cases abnormal CT/MRI aspects were described, including ventricular enlargement (3 cases); leukomalacia, cerebral atrophy, an abnormal white-gray matter difference, a small ventricular system, an asymmetric ventricular system, diffuse cerebral lesions and plagiocephaly (each in 1 patient).

Diagnosis

For establishing the diagnosis of AS in our patients, we analysed the consistent, frequent and associated features of the patients.

Consistent features of the patients with AS

The review of the 15 patients with AS showed that each consistent feature of AS, implementing developmental delay, speech impairment, a movement disorder or behavioral abnormalities were present in each patient.

Frequent features of the patients with AS

Each frequent feature of AS was present in the majority of the patients: an abnormal EEG was present in each case; microcephaly was present in 13 out of 15 patients, and 11 cases presented with a seizure disorder.

Associated features of the patients with AS

According to current literature, associated features in AS patients can vary from 20% to 80%. The case review of the 15 patients with AS showed that a wide mouth with wide spaced teeth was present in 14 patients; hypopigmented skin, light hair and eye color was found in 13 cases; a wide-based gait was observed in 10 children; a flat occiput was present in 9 patients; trunk hypotonia during infancy was also found in 9 cases; sleep disturbances and fascination with water were each presented by 7 children; hyperactive extremity deep tendon reflexes, flexed arm position during ambulation and prognathia was each found in 6 patients; a protruding tongue and excessive mouthing behavior was each observed in 5 cases; frequent drooling and strabismus was each found in 2 patients; feeding problems during infancy and scoliosis was each present in 1 child.

Patient scores for consistent, frequent and associated features of AS

The consistent features were present in all patients, frequent features were found in over 80% of cases and associated features were demonstrated to be present in 43% of the children.

Genetical diagnostic tests in the patients with AS

12 patients were diagnosed with FISH; the other 3 patients were negative for FISH and also negative for methylation PCR, and need an UBE3A sequence analysis for a genetical diagnosis of AS; nevertheless, their clinical features are sufficient for the diagnosis of AS. ❑

DISCUSSIONS

AS is a rare genetic condition with a prevalence of 1/15.000 – 1/20.000, which explains the small number of patients included in this study.

Even though not much is known about the preconceptional and conceptional period of patients with AS, some studies associate in vitro fertilization, especially intracytoplasmic sperm injection or a hormonal regimen with imprinting disorders, such as AS. There is no higher risk for preterm births than in the general population.

AS is a severe neurodevelopmental disorder, with a complex clinical picture. Yet, in an infant or small child with psychom*otor delay, the characteristic facial features (deep set eyes; pointed chin; wide, smiling mouth) associated with blonde hair/blue eyes (especially in those with microdeletion), happy disposition, jerky movements, and ataxia should raise a strong suspicion of AS. Due to the above-described characteristic phenotype, the clinical diagnosis could be made with relative ease, even in younger children (aged 6 months-3 years), contrary to the more general opinion of a difficult diagnosis. All patients from this study presented the characteristic facial features and the characteristic behavior phenotype.

Motor development was delayed in all children, especially in that regard the ability to walk. A retarded mental development was noted in all cases, most of cases (73%) presenting with sever mental retardation. This observation is consistent with other studies that also found the majority of patients with severe mental delay. The severity of the delay increases proportionally with age, explaining the current mild phenotype of case 14.

53% of the children investigated by CT/MRI presented some abnormal aspects, including ventricular enlargement, leukomalacia, cerebral atrophy, an abnormal white-gray matter difference, diffuse cerebral lesions and plagiocephaly. Some of these findings were reported, also, by other authors and considered as nonspecific (11).

In agreement with the literature, epileptic seizures were observed in all patients with microdeletion, starting from infancy/early childhood. The seizure type distribution of our cohort was not similar to the predominant myoclonic seizures reported in the literature. Thus, the most frequent seizures were partial seizures, followed in frequency by atonic seizures and atypical absences; no patient had convulsive status epilepticus. One child presented infantile spasms (case 9). Regardless the individual natural course of the seizures, EEG in all children showed the characteristic pattern for AS, namely a slow background activity, mixed with spikes, even before epilepsy onset.

In our study, each consistent feature of AS, implementing developmental delay, speech impairment, a movement disorder or behavioral abnormalities were present in all patients. Also, the frequent features of AS found in over 80% of cases: an abnormal EEG was present in all cases; microcephaly was present in 13 patients, and 11 cases presented seizures. The associated features were demonstrated to be present in 43% of the children. All these features, together, allowed us to establish a clinical diagnosis of AS. ❑

CONCLUSIONS

Angelman syndrome is a rare and severe neurodevelopmental disorder, with a complex clinical picture. There are some characteristic facial features (deep set eyes; pointed chin; wide, smiling mouth), which, in association with hypopigmentation, happy disposition, jerky movements, and ataxia in an infant or small child with psychom*otor delay, should raise the strong suspicion of AS. Epileptic seizures are very common in children with AS – microdeletion type; in our cohort the most common seizure types were partial seizures, atonic seizures, and atypical absences. EEG in children with AS has a very characteristic pattern (slow background activity, mixed with spikes) and is a very useful instrument in the diagnosis of AS.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the following grants: CNCSIS project no. 1203, PN project no 09330203 and PN II project no. 42-130.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

none declared.

References

1. Parker JN, Parker PM. The official parent's sourcebook on Angelman syndrome. ICON Group International, Inc. 2004;1:10–11. [Google Scholar]

2. Parker JN, Parker PM. Angelman syndrome – a bibliography and dictionary for physicians, patients, and genome researchers. ICON Group International, Inc. 2007;1:10–11. [Google Scholar]

3. Petersen MB, Brondum-Nielson K, Hansen LK, et al. Clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular diagnosis of Angelman syndrome: estimated prevalence rate in a Danish county. Am J Med Genet. 1995;60:261–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Thomson AK, Glasson EJ, Bittles AH. A long-term population-based clinical and morbidity profile of Angelman syndrome in Western Australia: 1953-2003. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:299–305. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Pschyrembel W. Pschyrembel- Klinisches Wöretrbuch. De Gruyter. 2012;263:80–81. [Google Scholar]

6. Sarimski K. Entwicklungspsychologie genetischer Syndrome-Kapitel 11: Angelman Syndrom. Hogrefe Verlag GmbH und Co. KG Göttingen-Bern-Toronto-Seattle. 2003;3:387–408. [Google Scholar]

7. Laan LAEM, Halley D, den Boer ATH, et al. Angelman syndrome without detectable chromosome 15q11-13 anomaly: a clinical study of familial and isolated cases. Am J Med Genet. 1998;76:262–268. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Williams CA, Peters SU, Calculator SN. Facts about Angelman syndrome. Angelman Syndrome Foundation, Inc. 2009;7:1–30. [Google Scholar]

9. Clayton-Smith J, Laan L. Angelman syndrome: A review of clinical and genetical aspects. J Med Genet. 2003;40:87–95. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Williams CA, Beaudet AL, Clayton-Smith J, et al. Angelman syndrome 2005: updated consensus for diagnostic criteria. Am J Med Genet. 2006;140:413–418. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Buoni S, Grosso S, Pucci L, et al. Diagnosis of Angelman syndrome: clinical and EEG criteria. Brain Dev. 1999;21:296–302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mædica are provided here courtesy of Amaltea Medical, Editura Magister

Diagnostic Approach of Angelman Syndrome (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Stevie Stamm

Last Updated:

Views: 5795

Rating: 5 / 5 (60 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Stevie Stamm

Birthday: 1996-06-22

Address: Apt. 419 4200 Sipes Estate, East Delmerview, WY 05617

Phone: +342332224300

Job: Future Advertising Analyst

Hobby: Leather crafting, Puzzles, Leather crafting, scrapbook, Urban exploration, Cabaret, Skateboarding

Introduction: My name is Stevie Stamm, I am a colorful, sparkling, splendid, vast, open, hilarious, tender person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.